![]() ![]() ![]() He knows how to drive very well, and so he drives very fast. For example, if I argue that: John is driving a car. What is particularly irritating about this book is that it uses unbelievably redundant and circular argumentation. It is because of them that economics has gained a reputation of being an unethical, ridiculously self-aggrandising, and thick-headed discipline. We all know that there is a certain class of economists that believe in these principles in the same way that fundamentalists believe in certain religious principles. ![]() Economists are therefore in possession of sacred knowledge, while politicians in their infinite stupidity insist on interfering with free markets, therefore spreading mayhem. It is precise, infallible, and deterministic in its infinite wisdom. 2.Ğconomy is a science comparable to physics or chemistry. Any attempt to interfere with the laws of free markets can only result in terrible consequences for society. This book is a particularly boring attempt to brainwash the reader into believing that: 1.ğree markets are capable of optimising all sorts of economic relations among people and companies. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |